In our examination of companies operating Salesforce alongside Zuora, Stripe, or NetSuite, we find between 1% and 5% of contracted revenue diverging between the quote that was approved and the invoices that followed. We identify the divergence, in dollars, per account, with evidence.
A representative quarter, four accounts, two systems. Press the button; read what the ledger says.
Drop a quote export and an invoice export. Columns identify themselves; the reconciliation runs on your device. Nothing uploads. Nothing persists. Refresh, and it never happened.
The examiner cannot be the examined. Your CPQ will not audit your billing; your billing will not audit your CPQ. Independence is not a feature of this instrument — it is the instrument.
Every price, verdict, and finding is computed by versioned, pure functions. Language models parse language; they are structurally unable to produce a number. There is no field in any model output where a price can enter.
Each decision is bound to the one before it. Alter any historical record and the chain breaks from that point forward — detectably, provably, permanently.
Every calculation is stamped with its pricing and policy version, both immutably registered. Any figure from any date can be re-derived on demand — byte for byte.
Deploys by container inside your network, behind your SSO. In pilot form it requires no access whatsoever: two exported files, examined and returned.
If we find nothing, you owe nothing and sleep better. If we find something, the schedule of findings will argue our case more persuasively than we could.
Found prior-period leakage in the pilot but no budget line to fix it? We recover it on contingency: 15% of recovered prior-period dollars, capped at $25,000 — attribution proven by the recovery ledger, every recovered dollar traceable to its finding. Recovery fees credit toward your first year of Continuous Examination.
No — structurally. Models parse language, suggest mappings, and draft prose. Prices, verdicts, and findings come from deterministic, versioned engines. No model output contains a field through which a number can reach the money path.
Neither system. Your CRM owns quotes; your billing owns invoices. The disagreement between them — quantified, per account, with evidence — is the product. We are an instrument of verification, not a fourth system of record.
The normal case, and the pilot is designed for it: each team exports one report from its own system. No shared access, no security review, no cross-team negotiation. Read-only connections come later, if the first schedule of findings justifies them.
One disposition marks a finding as expected; suppression is scoped to that exact account, item, and issue class — never blanket — and the suppression itself is recorded in the evidence chain. Fixed issues that recur re-flag deliberately.
Yes. Every figure is stamped with the pricing and policy versions in force when it was computed, both immutably registered. Re-derivation is one operation and agrees to the cent.
Two exports. Forty-eight hours. One figure your CFO will repeat in the next staff meeting.